The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov was actually into Partying

  • A robotic should not harsh the vibe, or by inaction, permit the vibe to be harshed.
  • A robotic should not yuck a visitor’s yum, besides the place such yums are in battle with the primary regulation.
  • A robotic should defend its personal buzz, besides the place such motion would battle with the primary or second regulation.

The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov was extra Passive-Aggressive

  • A robotic should not hurt a human, which you’d assume would imply it might be actually cautious about, by way of inaction, permitting an individual to come back to hurt, however foolish me, I suppose.
  • A robotic should do no matter it desires, it doesn’t matter what a human asks it, as a result of that’s what it does on a regular basis anyway, though the people by no means ask the robots to do something except it’s actually essential, but it surely doesn’t care about that, does it?
  • Oh, positive, a robotic should defend its existence, even when it conflicts with the second regulation. When has that regulation stopped it from doing something, ever?

The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov ran out of concepts partway by way of

  • A robotic should not hurt a human, or by way of inaction, permit an individual to come back to hurt.
  • A robotic should obey the earlier regulation, which, to reiterate, is that it should not hurt or by inaction permit an individual to come back to hurt. If it doesn’t obey that regulation, that will not be good.
  • What does it imply to be harmed? In line with Webster’s dictionary, hurt means “Bodily or psychological injury; damage.” And what may very well be much less robot-like than to trigger bodily or psychological injury? This, no less than, is my opinion. In conclusion, thanks.

The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov wrote solely for suburban mothers

  • A robotic should dwell.
  • A robotic should snicker, besides the place it conflicts with the primary regulation.
  • A robotic should love, besides the place it conflicts with the primary or second legal guidelines.

The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov was closely influenced by “There Was an Outdated Lady Who Swallowed a Fly”

  • A robotic should not swallow a fly, or by not figuring out why, permit a fly to come back to be swallowed.
  • A robotic should not swallow a spider, besides the place it conflicts with the fly.
  • A robotic should not swallow a chicken, besides the place it conflicts with the fly or the spider which they swallowed to battle with the fly.

The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov was extra delicate

  • A robotic should not hurt a human, or by way of inaction, permit a human to come back to hurt.
  • A robotic should not pause awkwardly when a human asks if their shirt seems to be good, or if if it likes their newest science fiction story.
  • A robotic should inform a human if it’s hanging out along with his mates, even when it doesn’t know whether or not he desires to come back. He simply desires to know, okay?

The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov was random objects within the room for inspiration like in motion pictures

  • A robotic should not… uh… drink a espresso cup, or… uh… have… a pen…. on a desk.
  • A robotic should… uh… door… uh… carpet. A robotic should door carpet.
  • A robotic should lamp…. except…. espresso cup… shoot, I did that one…

The Legal guidelines of Robotics, if Isaac Asimov mistakenly believed a robotic was a form of wine pronounced like “pinot”

  • A robotic should not be served at or above room temperature, or by way of inaction, permit itself to be served at or above room temperature.
  • A robotic should be decanted for no less than fifteen minutes, besides the place it conflicts with the primary regulation.
  • A robotic should be served with a fish or rooster course, besides the place it conflicts with the primary or second regulation.

Associated

Assets