The Most Underrated Automotive Element of All Time

Whereas typically missed, except you drive an electrical automobile, there’s possible a seemingly humble steel can connected to your exhaust pipe that’s a completely unbelievable piece of chemical engineering, a product of a herculean however now largely-forgotten feat of politics and industrial analysis and improvement that some students have in comparison with the Apollo Program. That is the fascinating story of the catalytic converter, maybe probably the most underrated automotive part of all time.

Catalytic converters are designed to scale back an engine’s emissions by changing dangerous exhaust merchandise like unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen oxides into extra benign compounds like carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and water vapour. Because the title suggests, that is achieved by using a catalyst, a substance which quickens the speed of a chemical response however takes no half within the response itself. Catalysts work by permitting response pathways with decrease activation energies, lowering the vitality barrier required for a response to happen. For instance, a catalyst might adsorb the reactants onto its floor, making it simpler for them to bond, or might type intermediate compounds with the reactants that may extra simply react with each other. In both case, on the finish of the response the catalyst is left unaltered, permitting it to be reused virtually indefinitely.

Older catalytic converters are often called two-way fashions, as they solely catalyze two oxidation reactions. First, they break down unburned hydrocarbons into hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen, then recombine these components into carbon dioxide and water; and second, they convert carbon monoxide into carbon dioxide. The yr 1981, nevertheless, noticed the introduction of three-way converters, which may additionally catalyze discount reactions changing nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide – precursors to photochemical smog and acid rain – into innocent nitrogen fuel.

Whereas catalytic converters didn’t start showing on automobiles till the mid-Seventies, the expertise is considerably older. As early as 1909 – only a yr after the introduction of the Ford Mannequin T – French chemist Michel Frankel gave a speech on the seventh Worldwide Congress on Utilized Chemistry in London by which he proposed “…supplementary combustion within the exhaust field, with assistance from a catalytic agent” to assist cut back future emissions from these newfangled cars. Whereas this proposal was actually prophetic, on the time air air pollution was nothing new. Certainly, London’s notorious “pea soup fog” was not truly fog however relatively a noxious smog ensuing from the burning of coal which might – and infrequently did – show deadly when inhaled. Coal smog turned such a difficulty within the UK that in 1845 Parliament handed the Railway Clauses Consolidation Act, one of many first items of laws in historical past to control transport emissions.

Nonetheless, the true father of the fashionable catalytic converter was one other Frenchman: a mechanical and chemical engineer named Eugéne Jules Houdry. Houdry was born in 1892 in Domont, France, scion of a French steel-making household. He studied engineering at Paris’s École des Arts et Métiers, graduating high of his class and receiving a gold medal from the federal government earlier than becoming a member of his household’s metal agency in 1911. With the outbreak of the First World Conflict, Houdry joined the French Military, serving first within the artillery and later France’s first tank firm. Throughout the Second Battle of the Aisne in 1917, Houdry was critically wounded whereas making an attempt to restore his tank beneath heavy hearth – an motion for which he was awarded the Croix de Guerre and the Legion of Honour.

After the warfare, Houdry returned to the household agency and took up auto racing as a passion, driving a Bugatti race automobile in his spare time. His obsession with growing engine efficiency ultimately led him to develop the catalytic cracking course of for refining crude oil and coal into high-performance automotive gas. This course of was much more environment friendly than the older thermal cracking course of and promised to fulfill the growing calls for of the ever-expanding automotive trade. In 1927, with the help of the French Authorities, Houdry constructed a pilot catalytic refinery in St. Julien de Peyrolas. Sadly, the plant’s output was far decrease than anticipated and, unable to safe additional help from the Authorities or Business, Houdry moved to the US, settling in Paulsboro, New Jersey in 1930. Right here, he labored with Socony Vacuum and Solar Oil to develop improved variations of his catalytic course of, with the primary full-scale refinery opening in Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, in 1937. By 1942, fourteen “Houdry Items” have been working throughout the US, producing giant portions of high-octane aviation gas which proved decisive within the closing Allied victory within the Second World Conflict.

After the warfare, Houdry turned his consideration to a different downside: air air pollution, which even within the Nineteen Forties was changing into a major problem in commuter-heavy cities like Detroit and Los Angeles. Although the hyperlink was as but unproven, Houdry suspected that car emissions have been chargeable for a current spike in lung most cancers charges, and he got down to invent a tool to wash up exhaust gases. In 1948, he shaped an organization referred to as Oxy-Catalyst Inc. in Wayne, Pennsylvania, establishing a laboratory and workplace in a transformed ballroom and horse steady. Inside two years, Houdry developed a catalytic converter to be used on manufacturing unit smokestacks. This consisted of a steel field containing a bundle of porcelain rods over which exhaust gases would movement. These rods, in flip, have been coated in aluminium oxide and platinum, the latter of which acted because the catalyst to transform unburned hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide into water and carbon dioxide. He later developed a smaller model – the “catalytic muffler” to be used in car exhaust programs, for which he was awarded the Society of Chemical Business’s prestigious Perkin Medal. An amazingly-written 1955 article in In style Mechanics breathlessly defined to readers simply how this intelligent new system labored:

“A catalyst is sort of a heckler who prods two different guys to combat. A cat by no means does a lot combating himself – he’s wanted to maintain issues stirred up.

“In your automobile’s exhaust pipe the difficulty is that no one needs to combat. The waste hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide coming down out of your engine aren’t scorching sufficient to combine it up with oxygen – in different phrases, burn. Like snakes on a chilly day they’re too lazy to combat.

“So Houdry throws in a cat, and – wham! – a combat begins. Oxygen from the air leaps with a snarl on the smelly stuff. Whereas the cats glow with the warmth of the combat, oxygen rips the hydrocarbons aside. The hydrogen joins among the oxygen to type water (H2O). And the widowed carbon is swallowed by different oxygen, burning into innocent carbon dioxide (CO2). Lethal carbon monoxide (CO) will get the enterprise, too. Attacked by oxygen, it additionally burns to (CO2).”

Who stated science writing needed to be boring?

Houdry was notably pleased with his creation, boasting:

“Put them on all automobiles and watch the lung most cancers curve dip.”

Sadly, this was to not be – a minimum of, not in Houdry’s lifetime. For one factor, public concern over air air pollution was nowhere close to intense sufficient to persuade automotive corporations to undertake such a brand new, doubtlessly costly system. However there was a fair larger, extra sensible downside. On the time, gasoline contained tetraethyl result in enhance its octane ranking and forestall engine knocking, and lead residue within the exhaust tended to coat or “poison” the catalyst, rendering the catalytic converter ineffective after solely a yr or two of standard driving. Consequently, Houdry turned away from common cars and as a substitute started creating catalytic converters for forklifts and mining equipment utilized in confined areas, the place carbon monoxide ranges might shortly construct as much as deadly ranges. Such equipment usually ran on low-grade, unleaded gas, eliminating the catalyst poisoning downside. Eugène Houdry died in 1962 on the age of 70, his dream of curbing car emissions unrealized.

Nonetheless, that very same yr noticed the publication of Silent Spring, Rachel Carson’s basic exposé of the risks of artificial pesticides like DDT. This ebook helped launch the fashionable environmental motion, which by the late Nineteen Sixties had grown so giant and influential that politicians and trade have been pressured to take discover. By 1969, smog over Detroit, Los Angeles, and different cities had gotten so dangerous that residents generally couldn’t see the solar at midday, mother and father have been cautious of letting their kids play outdoors, and buildings needed to be repainted each few years. This disaster spurred the federal government of then-California governor Ronald Reagan to go sweeping state emissions laws. The Federal Authorities shortly adopted go well with, and on January 1, 1970, President Richard Nixon signed the Nationwide Environmental Coverage Act. Lower than a yr later, he established the Environmental Safety Company or EPA, whose first Administrator, Assistant Lawyer Basic William D. Ruckelshaus, instantly ordered the mayors of the heavily-polluted cities of Cleveland, Atlanta, and Detroit to wash up their waterways inside six months or face authorized motion. And earlier than the yr was out, President Nixon signed a large enlargement to the 1963 Clear Air Act, which set nationwide requirements for car emissions. Particularly, it referred to as for car producers and oil corporations to scale back exhaust emissions – notably smog-causing nitrogen oxides – by 90% and to get rid of leaded gasoline from all main service stations by 1975.

As you may think, this didn’t go down effectively with automakers. The Authorities had simply thrown down what science author Tim Palucka as soon as referred to as:

“…a gauntlet comparable in spirit to President John F. Kennedy’s 1961 problem to place a person on the moon earlier than the tip of the last decade. Each have been daring strokes that positioned a burden squarely on the shoulders of the nation’s scientists and engineers. And each appeared unimaginable.”

Certainly, with a purpose to get cleaner automobiles rolling off the meeting line by the 1975 mannequin yr, producers must full the required analysis and improvement work inside solely 2-3 years – an absurdly quick turnaround for expertise no one knew was even potential. Ernest Starkman, vp in command of the environmental-activities workers of Basic Motors, balked that:

“The cleaner the automobile is from a air pollution standpoint, the more durable it’s to make it run effectively.”

Whereas then Ford president Lee Iacocca claimed that to adjust to the laws, the auto trade must flat-out cease producing automobiles for a number of years:

“Regardless of how a lot we spend and the way many individuals we assign to the duty, we don’t suppose we will do it by Jan. 1, 1975. Below this invoice we might be directed to scale back all emissions by 90 p.c even when no one is aware of the best way to cut back emissions by 90 p.c.”

However the EPA refused to again down, forcing Large 4 in Detroit to aim the unimaginable. Even EPA Administrator William Ruckelshaus later admitted that the Clear Air Act was overly bold, stating in 1985 that:

“We thought we had applied sciences that might management pollution, maintaining them under threshold ranges at an inexpensive value, and that the one issues lacking within the equation have been nationwide requirements and a robust enforcement effort…The entire nation’s early environmental legal guidelines mirrored these assumptions, and each one among these assumptions is flawed.”

With the clock ticking, the automakers determined to sort out the issue of emissions on two fronts: on the supply utilizing improved carburetors, pre-combustion chambers, and twin spark plugs to advertise extra full combustion of the gas; and on the exhaust finish utilizing catalytic converters to wash up any remaining emissions. At first, most analysis targeted on pre-combustion emission discount, as Rodney Bagley, an engineer at Corning Glass Works later recalled:

“Hanging a chemical reactor beneath a automobile was not one thing the auto corporations wished to do. They thought that it might be a short-term stopgap till they may design an engine that would cut back emissions utilizing a precombustion chamber or another gizmo.”

Within the decade since Eugène Houdry’s loss of life, catalytic converter expertise had superior considerably, with corporations like Corning in New York, 3M in Minnesota, and Englehard Industries in New Jersey all creating extra refined alternate options to Houdry’s porcelain-rod design. Nonetheless, all have been stymied by the identical lead-poisoning situation, which might have pressured motorists to vary their converters – or on the very least the catalyst inside – yearly. Nonetheless, the 1970 Clear Air Act’s requirement that leaded gasoline be eradicated by 1975 all of the sudden made these designs possible.

The primary firm to develop a manufacturing catalytic converter was GM, which on the time was not solely the world’s largest automaker but in addition its single largest employer. After assigning over 5,000 staff to the duty, together with former DuPont chemist Richard Klimisch, GM got here up with a pelletized catalytic converter containing a whole lot of aluminium-oxide beads coated in platinum and palladium catalysts. Whereas GM had examined dozens of cheaper metals like copper and iron, these have been unable to resist excessive exhaust temperatures. Based on GM promotional materials, every converter used lower than 1/10 of a troy ounce – round 3 grams – of catalyst, but was in a position to cut back tailpipe hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions by over 90%. Moreover, due to modifications made on the combustion finish, the brand new converter-equipped GM fashions achieved 15% extra miles per gallon than their predecessors – proving that Ernest Starkman’s issues about cleaner automobiles being much less environment friendly have been totally unfounded. To make sure that drivers didn’t destroy their catalytic converters, 1975 GM fashions featured a smaller gas-filling port that wouldn’t match older leaded-gas nozzles.

However whereas a number of different corporations like AMC and Toyota opted to license GM’s pelletized catalytic converter, the design was quickly discovered to be essentially flawed. For one factor, vibration induced the pellets to grind towards one another and regularly put on off their catalyst coating, ultimately rendering the converter ineffective. Worse nonetheless, carbureted engines tended to swing wildly between lean and wealthy combustion, leading to excessive exhaust temperatures that might soften the catalytic converter. And whereas GM advertising and marketing had boasted that with their design, drivers want solely exchange the pellets and never the entire converter, in actuality drivers have been unwilling to pay for this type of common upkeep, and GM was pressured to search for various designs.

In the meantime, Ford and Chrysler opted for extra refined designs developed by 3M, Englehard Industries, and Corning Glass Works. 3M and Englehard had developed a ceramic materials manufactured from zirconia and mullite which may very well be extruded into corrugated sheets and rolled right into a cylinder, making a monolithic honeycomb construction with an enormous inner floor space that may not put on down over time like GM’s pelletized converter. Corning’s design, nevertheless, was much more refined. Corning had experimented with dozens of strategies for producing a robust, steady honeycomb substrate, corresponding to rolling up sheets with glass nibs or ridges to separate them, stacking collectively round or triangular tubes, or extruding skinny alumina “noodles” into one thing resembling a fowl’s nest. Nonetheless, all these constructions turned out to be too costly to fabricate or too fragile to face as much as common street use. It was then that engineer Rodney Bagley come across a sublime resolution: why not extrude the substrate by a die, creating a tricky, monolithic honeycomb with hundreds of tiny channels working front-to-back? Whereas easy in idea, implementing this course of proved to be a significant engineering problem. If the die wasn’t designed precisely proper or the ceramic formulated simply so, the tiny channels would instantly collapse after extrusion like, as Bagley put it, “a moist newspaper.” The flawed ceramic would additionally broaden and warp when uncovered to the warmth of an car’s exhaust, inflicting it to clog up and disintegrate. Nonetheless, after months of feverish work and 100-hour weeks, Bagley and his colleagues developed a sensible extrusion course of and a substrate materials composed of methylcellulose and artificial cordierite – a mix of talc, aluminium silicate, and aluminium oxide. This yielded a steady, stable honeycomb construction with partitions as skinny as two thousandths of an inch or 0.05 millimetres. On November 9, 1971, the Corning group filed a patent for his or her design, which was lastly granted in February 1974.

However Corning wasn’t out of the woods but. With the 1975 deadline quick approaching, they must construct a catalytic converter manufacturing unit earlier than their converter design was even finalized. It was an enormous gamble, however a crucial one. Not solely did Corning stand to reap a $100 million windfall in catalytic converter gross sales if their design reached the market first, however the destiny of the American automotive trade now rested of their fingers. In the event that they failed, Ford, Chrysler, and different corporations would successfully be pressured to close down till an efficient catalytic converter may very well be developed. Ultimately, the race to the 1975 deadline proved to be a close-run factor. In June 1975, a large flood severely delayed building on the manufacturing unit website in Erwin, New York, whereas in 1973 the Corning was hit by a triple-whammy of technical points. Prototype converters saved shaking free on the take a look at observe, issues with the crystal construction of the cordierite substrate induced the honeycombs to warp, and – most worrying of all – the EPA made a disturbing discovery: catalytic converters would mix sulphur contaminants from gasoline with hydrogen and oxygen to type sulphuric acid. As one Corning engineer recalled:

“I had two components of the company pitted towards one another. The Cell Supply folks have been mainly engineers, and the opposite facet of the coin was represented by the well being scientists. The latter group argued that catalytic converters would emit a effective aerosol of sulfuric acid, in order that anybody standing alongside a Los Angeles freeway would basically be inhaling a sulfuric acid mist, which was extraordinarily damaging to well being. This was a really robust resolution to make. I got here down on the facet of the catalytic converter, which, in hindsight, appears to have been the suitable resolution.”

Certainly, testing revealed that sulphuric acid emissions weren’t a significant hazard, and the venture was pulled again from the brink of failure. The opposite points have been additionally ultimately labored out, and by the point the 1975 mannequin yr rolled round, the Large 4 automakers had completed the unimaginable: assembly the EPA’s stringent tips in lower than 5 years. It was a spectacular achievement, and one of many biggest feats of business analysis and improvement in historical past. As Rodney Bagley later recalled:

“Having a significant breakthrough could be very uncommon in any firm. Within the catalytic converter we had two main breakthroughs: a brand new course of and new supplies that didn’t exist earlier than.”

For his historic position in lowering world emissions, in 2002 Bagley, alongside together with his colleagues Irwin Lachlan and Ronald Lewis, have been inducted into the Nationwide Inventors Corridor of Fame.

But, regardless of this triumph, automakers resented the Authorities meddling of their enterprise and expended appreciable effort making an attempt to color catalytic converters as a ineffective passing fad. Certainly, Alan Loofbourrow, Vice President of Engineering at Chrysler, referred to as the catalytic converter “the dumbest factor to ever occur to the car”, whereas in the present day it’s suspected that the explanation GM held on to its problematic pelletized design for thus lengthy was to offer catalytic converters as an entire a foul title. Different corporations discovered methods of getting across the laws altogether. For instance, because the Clear Air Act mandated catalytic converters for all automobiles beneath 6,000 kilos, in 1975 Ford launched a brand new mannequin to its F-series of pickup vehicles that was simply barely heavier than the cutoff. Often called the F-150, it stays the best-selling pickup truck in the US.

But regardless of this grumbling, the EPA held agency, and by the tip of the Seventies catalytic converters turned customary gear on almost all client automobiles. However there was nonetheless loads of work to be completed. The primary era of catalytic converters have been so-called two-way fashions, which did nothing to scale back the nitrogen oxides chargeable for photochemical smog. The EPA had eliminated NOx requirements from its 1975 necessities to permit producers to concentrate on lowering carbon dioxide and hydrocarbon emissions, however was attributable to reintroduce them for the 1976 mannequin yr. Nonetheless, the 1973-74 oil prompted the EPA to increase the deadline to 1978; whereas in 1977 it prolonged it once more to 1981. This time, it was Englehard Industries of New Jersey who offered the required breakthrough. Changing nitrogen oxides to plain nitrogen requires a discount relatively than an oxidation response, and Englehard found that rhodium, one other member of the platinum group of metals, effectively catalyzed this response. Englehard’s first design was a two-stage system, with one converter oxidizing carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons and one other lowering nitrogen oxides. This technique, nevertheless, was cumbersome, heavy, and costly, and sure to show unpopular with auto producers. It was then that Englehard chemists John Mooney and Carl Keith got here up with an ingenious resolution: including cerium oxide, which might both launch or retailer oxygen by switching between its CeO₂ and Ce₂O₃ types. This breakthrough allowed each oxidation and discount to happen inside the identical catalytic converter. Launched in 1973, such three-way converters quickly turned customary throughout the automotive trade, and stay in use to today. In 2001, Keith and Mooney have been awarded the celebrated Walter Ahlstrom Engineering Prize for his or her invention.

Fashionable three-way converters can take away as much as 98% of poisonous pollution from a automobile’s exhaust and are estimated to have saved some 800 million tons of pollution out of the environment because the Seventies. Whereas the fundamental design of catalytic converters has modified comparatively little over the past 50 years, they’ve benefited enormously from different advances in automobile design corresponding to oxygen sensors and gas injection programs, which permit engines to run at an optimum stoichiometric ratio – that’s, neither too wealthy or too lean – lowering emissions on the supply and permitting catalytic converters to function at peak effectivity.

But regardless of 50 years of improvement, issues nonetheless stay. For instance, catalytic converters should attain a sure temperature to function effectively, that means automobiles are likely to emit bigger quantities of pollution within the first couple of minutes after startup – particularly in chilly climates. Producers have provide you with a number of options to this downside, together with inserting the converter near the engine exhaust manifold, including electrical heaters, or putting in a smaller “pre-cat” forward of the primary converter – all of which considerably cut back the converter’s warm-up time and total emissions. And whereas lead has been eradicated from gasoline, catalytic converters can nonetheless be poisoned by sulphur, phosphorus, and manganese present in gasoline and gas components. Nonetheless, the discount or elimination of sulphur and phosphorus from most gasoline blends has largely eradicated this downside.

However the greatest downside with catalytic converters is the very supplies which make their alchemy potential: the valuable metals platinum, palladium, and rhodium. Certainly, these metals have been the main target of nice controversy surrounding the preliminary adoption of catalytic converters, for within the Seventies a lot of the world’s reserves got here from the Soviet Union and apartheid South Africa. At present, catalytic converters account for 40% of the world’s demand for platinum, 70% of the demand for palladium, and 80% of the demand for rhodium, with the worldwide automotive trade spending greater than $40 billion yearly on these metals alone. In recent times, rising calls for for emissions management – particularly in China – has induced the costs of those metals to skyrocket has induced the worth of platinum to skyrocket from $800 an oz. in 1986 to almost $1,400 in the present day. Equally, the worth of palladium has quintupled to $2,875 an ounce and rhodium to an eye-watering $21,900 an oz. – round 12 instances the worth of gold. This, in flip, has made catalytic converters a tempting goal for petty thieves, with unscrupulous scrap steel sellers paying wherever from $150 as much as $500 for a single unit. In 2022, greater than 64,000 catalytic converters have been stolen in the US alone, sticking the automobiles’ homeowners with restore payments typically in extra of $2,000. Probably the most generally focused automobiles are these with excessive wheelbases like pickup vehicles and SUVs since they’re the simplest for thieves to slide beneath, although hybrid automobiles just like the Toyota Prius are additionally common targets. It’s because their engines run much less typically than common automobiles, that means their converters are sometimes in higher situation.

As electrical automobiles grow to be more and more common, demand for catalytic converters – and their theft – might ultimately taper off. Till then, nevertheless, these ingenious gadgets will proceed to play an important – if typically missed – position in maintaining our air clear and breathable. So for now, simply watch out the place you park your automobile.

Broaden for References